Adult Mixed Videos Free

In order to treat survivors for late effects of cancer treatment in a cost-effective way with limited burden, an eHealth solution for survivors of childhood, adolescent and young adult (CAYA) cancer was developed and has recently been implemented at the Centre of Expertise for Cancer Survivorship. These so-called REVIVER interventions, with PCC as core principle, are part of cancer survivorship care to improve the following direct or indirect late effects of cancer treatment: CRF, self-efficacy and self-management or lifestyle. The interventions are led by a trained nurse who applies either cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing (MI) or a combination of both to help survivors overcome their late effects. However, there is a need for feasibility and potential effectiveness evaluations in order to implement the REVIVER interventions on a wider scale.

Adult Mixed Videos

The REVIVER study will involve a mixed methods research approach. Feasibility will primarily be assessed with qualitative measures, i.e. semi-structured interviews. Quantitative measures will be used to determine adherence to and gain insight into the potential effectiveness of the REVIVER interventions. Therefore, we will apply a single arm pre- and post-test design, with three different measurement points: baseline (T0), following the last session (T1) and 6 months post-intervention (T2). Figure 1 outlines the stages of participation in the REVIVER study interventions.

The mixed methods design to evaluate the REVIVER interventions, including qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires, will enable us to gain a broad and in-depth insight in the feasibility and potential effectiveness of these interventions. Most importantly, we will be able to identify areas for improvement. This is paramount for further implementation of the interventions and designing a randomized controlled trial to assess (cost-)effectiveness of the REVIVER interventions on a larger scale.

Moreover, before creating a video to back our eLearning course, we should also consider the nature of our target audience. One very important factor is age. For instance, when talking about adult learners, videos are more likely to be used, but not as the main part of the lesson. When it comes to children, video is the sine qua non of the learning procedure. Due to the fact that videos are mainly associated to entertainment, it seems that learners need to put less mental effort.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods needs assessment of older adults at two independent living facilities (sites A and B) in Northern California between September 2020 and March 2021. Voluntary surveys were distributed. Semistructured interviews were then conducted with participants who provided contact information. Surveys ascertained participants' preferred devices as well as comfort level, support, and top barriers regarding telephonic and video visits. Qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews identified key themes.

Conclusions: Substantial barriers exist for older adults in connecting with their health care team through telemedicine, particularly through video visits. The largest barriers include difficulty with technology or using the video visit platform, hearing difficulty, language barriers, and lack of desire to see providers virtually. Efforts to improve telemedicine access for older adults should take into account patient perspectives.

When a user visits a page served over HTTPS, their connection with the web server is encrypted with TLS and is therefore safeguarded from most sniffers and man-in-the-middle attacks. An HTTPS page that includes content fetched using cleartext HTTP is called a mixed content page. Pages like this are only partially encrypted, leaving the unencrypted content accessible to sniffers and man-in-the-middle attackers. That leaves the pages unsafe.

There are two categories for mixed content: mixed passive/display content and mixed active content. The difference lies in the threat level of the worst case scenario if content is rewritten as part of a man-in-the-middle attack. In the case of passive content, the threat is lower (the page may contain misleading content, or the user's cookies may be stolen). In the case of active content, the threat can lead to phishing, sensitive data disclosure, redirection to malicious sites, etc.

Mixed active content is content that has access to all or parts of the Document Object Model of the HTTPS page. This type of mixed content can alter the behavior of the HTTPS page and potentially steal sensitive data from the user. Hence, in addition to the risks described for mixed display content above, mixed active content is vulnerable to a few other attack vectors.

In the mixed active content case, a man-in-the-middle attacker can intercept the request for the HTTP content. The attacker can also rewrite the response to include malicious JavaScript code. Malicious active content can steal the user's credentials, acquire sensitive data about the user, or attempt to install malware on the user's system (by leveraging vulnerabilities in the browser or its plugins, for example).

The risk involved with mixed content does depend on the type of website the user is visiting and how sensitive the data exposed to that site may be. The webpage may have public data visible to the world or private data visible only when authenticated. If the webpage is public and has no sensitive data about the user, using mixed active content still provides the attacker with the opportunity to redirect the user to other HTTP pages and steal HTTP cookies from those sites.

Browsers may support automatic upgrade of requests for display/media content from HTTP to HTTPS on secure pages (this prevents mixed-content conditions in which some content is loaded securely while other content is insecure).

The Firefox Web Console displays a mixed content warning message in the Net pane when a page on your website has this issue. The mixed content resource that was loaded via HTTP will show up in red, along with the text "mixed content", which links to this page.

Starting in Firefox 23, mixed active content is blocked by default (and mixed display content can be blocked by setting a preference). To make it easier for web developers to find mixed content errors, all blocked mixed content requests are logged to the Security pane of the Web Console, as seen below:

To fix this type of error, all requests to HTTP content should be removed and replaced with content served over HTTPS. Some common examples of mixed content include JavaScript files, stylesheets, images, videos, and other media.

Note: The console will display a message indicating if mixed-display content is being successfully upgraded from HTTP to HTTPS (instead of a warning about "Loading mixed (insecure) display content").

The Firefox Web Console displays a mixed content warning message in the Net pane when a page on your website has this issue. The mixed content resource that was loaded via HTTP will show up in red, along with the text \"mixed content\", which links to this page. 041b061a72